erinoutdoors

For Christmas I got a fascinating present from a friend - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and higgledy-piggledy.xyz my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a couple of easy prompts about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an interesting read, and very amusing in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, but it's also a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It might have gone beyond in looking at data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repeated hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no animals). And wiki.monnaie-libre.fr there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, given that pivoting from compiling AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can buy any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody creating one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, created by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.

He wants to widen his range, creating different categories such as sci-fi, fraternityofshadows.com and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated products to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we in fact imply human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI -generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for creative purposes should be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without authorization must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very effective however let's develop it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have picked to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to utilize developers' content on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its finest carrying out industries on the vague promise of development."

A federal government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them license their content, access to high-quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a national data library including public information from a wide variety of sources will also be made readily available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a number of lawsuits versus AI companies, and wiki.snooze-hotelsoftware.de especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training data and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a portion of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

As for me and photorum.eclat-mauve.fr a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But offered how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure how long I can remain positive that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in global technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.